Author Topic: Beta 239.01  (Read 2826 times)

Offline Wisp

  • Moderator
  • Planewalker
  • *****
  • Posts: 1176
Beta 239.01
« on: April 17, 2016, 01:38:47 PM »
Sorry about the delay. I had planned on getting this out last week, but things got in the way.

Beta location.

Changes:
  • GAME_IS, ENGINE_IS and GAME_INCLUDES support SoD.
  • Allow EDIT_SAV_FILE to add wholly new files to SAV files.
  • New NOMOVE keyword for ADD_CRE_ITEM.
  • New TP2 when clause: IF_EXISTS
  • Fix regression in --change-log which produced only the last backup file instead of all of them.
  • GAME_IS et al. do not fail on unrecognised games.
  • Use the correct key value for WBM.
  • Add support for MENU, LUA, TTF, PNG, TOT, TOH key values.

Supposedly, ADD_KIT works as-is on EE v2.1. Please report any bugs and other things that must be done to support SoD well. I'm aware of the feature requests that have been made thus far (unless I've overlooked or forgotten about it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯).
« Last Edit: April 17, 2016, 01:39:26 PM by Wisp »

Offline Argent77

  • Planewalker
  • *****
  • Posts: 187
Re: Beta 239.01
« Reply #1 on: April 17, 2016, 01:55:24 PM »
Mac OS X download: WeiDU-Mac-23901.zip (use link above)
« Last Edit: April 17, 2016, 02:18:07 PM by Argent77 »

Offline Wisp

  • Moderator
  • Planewalker
  • *****
  • Posts: 1176
Re: Beta 239.01
« Reply #2 on: April 17, 2016, 02:03:52 PM »
Thanks.

Offline Argent77

  • Planewalker
  • *****
  • Posts: 187
Re: Beta 239.01
« Reply #3 on: April 21, 2016, 10:24:54 AM »
Regarding the new quest grouping mechanism introduced by EE patch v2.0: The old way of adding entries to BGEE.SQL doesn't appear to work correctly any more. However, the new way of adding entries to BGEE.LUA is not very different.

Example:

The following set of BGEE.SQL entries:
Code: [Select]
INSERT INTO quests ROWS
(
...
  2,'',74318,0,0,0,-1,    // Yoshimo needs to see Renal Bloodscalp
...
);

INSERT INTO journals_quests ROWS
(
...
  293,  2,0,0,'',-1,      // Once we entered the Docks District, Yoshimo informed me that the leader of the local Shadow Thieves, ...
...
);

converted into the BGEE.LUA format:
Code: [Select]
journal={}
info={}
user={}
quests_old =
{
...
  {  2,'',74318,0,0,0,-1},    // Yoshimo needs to see Renal Bloodscalp
...
};

journals_quests_old =
{
...
  {  293,  2,0,0,'',-1},      // Once we entered the Docks District, Yoshimo informed me that the leader of the local Shadow Thieves, ...
...
};

function buildQuestsTable()
  Infinity_Log("Initializing Quests")
  quests = {}
  userNotes = {}
  looseEntries = {}
  subGroups = {}
...
  createQuest    ( 74318 )
  createEntry    ( 74318, -1, 293, {}, nil )
...
end


The first two blocks are pretty much identical to the SQL entries. The final block inside buildQuestsTable() is new, but it looks easy enough to generate.

Offline Aedan

  • Planewalker
  • *****
  • Posts: 21
  • Gender: Male
Re: Beta 239.01
« Reply #4 on: May 02, 2016, 03:45:45 PM »
Hello!
The change log mentions a Weidu version 240, but right now I can download just the beta 239.01.
Has version 240 been released?

Offline jastey

  • Global Moderator
  • Planewalker
  • *****
  • Posts: 1524
  • Gender: Female
Re: Beta 239.01
« Reply #5 on: May 03, 2016, 03:43:26 AM »
This gives me a virus warning from my anti-virus software (Avira). I know it's probably a false-positive, but telling my anti-virus to ignore things makes me uneasy. Is there a chance that a higher WeiDU version will be inconspicuous again?

Offline The Imp

  • Planewalker
  • *****
  • Posts: 288
  • Gender: Male
Re: Beta 239.01
« Reply #6 on: May 03, 2016, 10:36:58 AM »
This gives me a virus warning from my anti-virus software (Avira). I know it's probably a false-positive, but telling my anti-virus to ignore things makes me uneasy. Is there a chance that a higher WeiDU version will be inconspicuous again?
Eventually when the v24000 weidu.exe is compiled and then reported to not be a virus software to the idiot anti-virus program, and then checked by them or just added to the list of allowed programs, and then that update is streamed to your computer, then it won't be flagged as a virus by Avira.

Has version 240 been released?
Check your self the latest official links in here, as of the posting of this, the answer was: Not yet.
Yeah, that's the same location without the "beta" sub directory.

Offline Wisp

  • Moderator
  • Planewalker
  • *****
  • Posts: 1176
Re: Beta 239.01
« Reply #7 on: May 03, 2016, 12:39:17 PM »
Hello!
The change log mentions a Weidu version 240, but right now I can download just the beta 239.01.
Has version 240 been released?
The changelog says v240 because all changes made after v239 are made towards v240. v239.01 would more conventionally be read as v240b1 or the like (as in, the first beta version of v240).

This gives me a virus warning from my anti-virus software (Avira). I know it's probably a false-positive, but telling my anti-virus to ignore things makes me uneasy. Is there a chance that a higher WeiDU version will be inconspicuous again?
It might of course be different this time, but it would be more likely that some update to your AV would result in WeiDU being reported as clean again. If you want, you can upload it to something like VirusTotal. Chances are there will be zero or a handful of hits, which suggests your AV is reporting a false-positive.
« Last Edit: May 03, 2016, 12:45:37 PM by Wisp »

Offline Aedan

  • Planewalker
  • *****
  • Posts: 21
  • Gender: Male
Re: Beta 239.01
« Reply #8 on: May 05, 2016, 04:11:06 AM »
@Wisp
Okay, thank you very much for your reply!

 

With Quick-Reply you can write a post when viewing a topic without loading a new page. You can still use bulletin board code and smileys as you would in a normal post.

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name: Email:
Verification:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image
Type the letters shown in the picture:
What color is grass?:
What is the seventh word in this sentence?:
What is five minus two (use the full word)?: