On the subject of twisting words, did anyone else notice that Baronius' last post in the once-again closed thread can be made to apply to him with relatively few alterations? In fact, the last seven sentences fit without *any* changes whatsoever!
By closing that thread, Baronius, you totally showed you cannot accept
our opinion. You simply cannot accept it.
Your posts were very low. Why? Because as
we already noticed, you take words out of context, and twist them.
If the only reason someone else's mod doesn't work with yours is that you've included specific code to prevent that other mod working, then of course it's prevention.
You, who is not the author of the mod, blame him for building a check for the required DB to his mod.
As
I already said, I didn't tell anything such what you imply i.e. that
including a check for a mod that is required for technical reasons is bad, etc.
All that I expressed that I think a real mod author always considers
fact and reality, and doesn't pay attention solely to
complaining about things that haven't happened and are highly unlikely ever to happen. Since future can bring new circumstances, general thinking is wiser than judging based solely on the present's practice. This is
*my* opinion, and yet you
claim it is yours. When you're out of arguments, you try to twist what others say,
and pretend that what they *really* said is what you've been saying all along. Shame on you.
Ask NiGHTMARE, he listed them. E.g. I remember the quest restoration in BD-W 1.6, which NiGHTMARE doesn't consider a fix, so he basically said such thing doesn't belong to the Fixpack. => fixes that won't be present.
Everyone who actually considers taking this seriously (even as an exaggeration, using irony), please scroll back and see that I emphasized it more times, at least twice that
it is a complete lie, and I strongly condemned any such
actions which are contrary to the author's own Terms of Use.
Yet you
still try to imply that
other people have said things which they have not. Shame on you.
When I first felt the discussion to have become useless and
made a joke, I was criticized as someone who
implied things he did not. So I started to reply, hoping that it receives some valid arguments,
but the thread had been locked. Now please someone tell me if twisting someone's words
on countless occasions instead of any actual arguments can be considered as an honest, fair way of submitting a reply.
You practically negated what you said you were fighting for, i.e. discussion with arguments and counter-arguments. Shame.
And what do I think why you did this? Because you were out of arguments, you couldn't add anything to the topic which would've made any sense. You couldn't accept that your forcing and pressure was useless, and you can't accept that you couldn't force an author do what you expect, and you couldn't prove your viewpoint with valid arguments. Twisting someone's words leads nowhere. Learn how to accept the reality, instead.