would've replied, but it's locked?

[clock sendak]

sorry.  I understand that it's your forum to do with as you please, but since i feel that i've come to know some of your voices around here, i was curious at to what some of you might think, not a bunch of folks on yahoo.  if you don't want to reply, you don't have to.  you don't even have to read it, that was the great thing about western civ.  you could just talk about stuff, and not make it such a big deal.  As i said, it's your forum to with as you please, but it's also somewhat regrettable.

cheers.

[jcompton]

I agree that it's regrettable. I'm sure we'll give it a whirl again eventually.

[clock sendak]

why, did you try it before with disastrous results?

[jcompton]

Yes, the religion/fuhrer rule only goes back about six months or so.

[clock sendak]

oh well.

[jester]

Basically one can safely say that the method of unmoderated free speech/slander failed to deliver the vivid, audacious and intellectual discussions you expect when pitting opinions in any argument including religion, sexual practises and/or orientation, world politics or societal concepts.