As an auntie and schoolmarm I am afraid I am programmed to respond to all 15 year olds as if they are the same. Sorry. In no way do I wish to imply there is anything wrong with being 15, or that being 15 means you are entitled to less respect, consideration or regard. Old does not equal wise, but maturity can help.
Since it is clear this is a serious question, and not a bait, we are good.
OK. This poll is so fixed. Look at the options. Whatever comes out, Drew can argue his point is proved. By putting in nonsense responses (encouraging behaviour Regullus has already described) he indicates this is not a serious poll, and hence people feel free to choose the nonsense response. If he had placed only serious options, what info would we have gained? The same? Different? As it is, all we have is further proof that Drew sucks at polls. And an opportunity to have another dig at Joe, and it is my duty to do that as often as possible.
By the way, I did not say Drew was wrong. I re-iterated my view re. his suckiness at polls. Saying people are wrong is boring and pointless. The idea is to adroitly juxtapose serious comments with ones made in jest, to lessen the chances of a snappy comeback. That's only when exchanging quips with Drew and others in the habit of thinking. Obviously, I have to keep it simple for Joe, because after all this time he still doesn't know when I am serious and when I am joking.