The offspring from a wolf x dog cross are fertile and able to reproduce. This fact
led to the taxonomic reclassification of the domestic dog by the Smithsonian Institute in 1993
as Canis lupus familiaris, a subspecies of the wolf.
Interesting. I did not know that. (Obviously.)
Anyway, I just don't consider Ebony and Jet or whatever "racist" magazines simply because they're based on the interests of a specific group of people. That would mean that virtually every magazine in circulation is an offensive "ism/ist" of some sort.
That depends on whether or not the focus of the magazine is something that the readers
cannot change, or at least not without difficulty (such as skin color, nationality, or language), or something that is a conscious choice (such as whether they like fishing, humor, needlepoint, naked women, etc). It's perfectly all right to make value judgements based on something that a person has
decided to do: For example, I am a nonsmoker and have at least one good reason to feel that I am 'better' than any smoker. It's only when decisions are made on a basis that has nothing to do with personality or morals ("Only Asians are allowed to join this club / work here / contribute to this magazine") that it becomes racist.
My rationale for seeing no difference between ethnocentricity and racism is that I don't have enough faith in humanity to believe that anyone can say, "Let's hear it for my race, rah rah rah," without also thinking, "I'm glad I'm not some other race, boo boo boo."