Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:

Verification:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What color is grass?:
What is the seventh word in this sentence?:
What is five minus two (use the full word)?:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: Dark Raven
« on: October 15, 2005, 10:57:31 PM »

Ya know reading this whol fucking post it looks just like that damned Jerry Springer show.

Feel the love babyy!  :D
Posted by: Loriel
« on: October 15, 2005, 05:29:47 AM »

I had to know about the plural form of 'ho', so I went to the definitive source for enlightenment. Apparently, Sim's right. ::)

EDIT:
Cross-referencing with the other words used to describe 'ho' produced this interesting definition.
Posted by: SimDing0
« on: October 15, 2005, 03:13:30 AM »

I have, for whatever reason, pondered the plural of "ho" quite extensively, and "hoes" was the best I could settle on, since anything like "ho's" isn't terribly satisfactory. I think I considered it at a similar point in my life to when I tried to argue that the plural of "penis" was "penii".
Posted by: Eral
« on: October 15, 2005, 01:45:57 AM »

Imrahil, it's this thread under the theme of JZ that has cheered me up. There's something about deeply held beliefs vitriolically discussed that I find uplifting.
I loathe all talk shows and believe that a special place in hell has been reserved for Jerry Springer. JZ will have no impact on my life.

Disbanding the guest post system would be a bad, bad idea. Trolling would be stifled, and we all value free speech too much to allow that.

Just as a completely uncharacteristic off-topic question, exactly how do you spell the plural of "ho"? If it is "hoes", does that change it's meaning to "obsolete farm implement"? This would be more original and entertaining than the traditional word. It obviously isn't the intention of the users of the word to be original and entertaining, but there's nothing to say we cannot set new standards of abuse. 
Posted by: Borsook
« on: October 15, 2005, 01:20:36 AM »

Like I said before, I find flamewars not without their merit, the only thing that bothers me is the quality of guest posts here. I just hope nobody will try to use it as an argument to disband the guest post system, which usually works great and is beneficial to everyone.
Posted by: Imrahil
« on: October 15, 2005, 12:56:39 AM »

Quote from: jcompton
Quote from: Ashara
I consider the conflict I carried inside me resolved to my satisfaction. At a price to myself, surely, but it was a price I was willing to pay.
I'll be sure to add a bullet point about Turnabout's power to help players along a journey of personal self-discovery.

Quote from: Eral
I was feeling quite depressed before I found it - and now I am completely cheered up.

Turnabout & JZ have something in common!

- Imrahil


Posted by: Eral
« on: October 15, 2005, 12:29:52 AM »

The women here might be more inclined to give Dahos a smacking if he clearly wasn't so afraid of that happening, hence posting as a guest troller. Some people just don't have the courage of their convictions.

Please don't take anything out of this wonderful thread. I am extremely upset it has taken me this long to notice it. I hope jc will archive it so we can all enjoy it years later, because it's a gem. I was feeling quite depressed before I found it - and now I am completely cheered up. The JZ thread over at EpicXtreme is nowhere near as fun as this.
Ding0 and Borsook get top marks for grace under pressure - remaining logical and expressing their opinions stylishly. Nightmare and Exodus are all out winners for passion, fervour and entertainment value.
I love the modding community. Don't ever change.

Posted by: Bons
« on: October 14, 2005, 08:22:35 PM »

To echo Regullus, as well as address the suggestion that some posts in this thread should be edited or removed because of their content:

I continue to have faith in the ability of the people who read and visit these forums to recognize and judge the merit of the arguments that they find here for themselves. I trust you all are fully capable of recognizing who is expressing an earnest opinion, and who is utilizing all the intelligence, wit and charm of my cats' litterbox. I heartily endorse your right as a visitor here to interpret others as a crusader, dreamer, indifferent spectator, insignificant asshole, snob, stalker, pointless pointmaker, outraged citizen, voice of reason or Canadian by their own words, not by my post-edited assurances. The Naughty Room should be reserved for the death threats, Hitler decoupage and (just in case Loriel is on the right track) whomever confesses to sleeping with Seifer in drag.


Posted by: Regullus
« on: October 14, 2005, 06:08:13 PM »

Check my sig for details on the hot chicks.
The only thing found there are ugly skank hos.

 You do of course realize that you are insulting many, many ppg members when you say that. It could be argued that you insult women in general w/such a remark. However, it is unlikely that the fairer sex would take any notice of something so insignificant as you. ;) I only notice, because I am, at the moment, exceptionally bored.
Posted by: DaHos
« on: October 14, 2005, 05:36:06 PM »

Check my sig for details on the hot chicks.
The only thing found there are ugly skank hos.
Posted by: i love hiphop mods
« on: October 14, 2005, 11:45:54 AM »

Well, one good thing came out of all this. I got my hip-hop mod.

Posted by: Shed
« on: October 14, 2005, 05:37:37 AM »

Check my sig for details on the hot chicks.
Posted by: Loriel
« on: October 14, 2005, 05:10:54 AM »

Yeah, but the question about hot girls over at SHS still hasn't been answered... ::)
Posted by: Ding0
« on: October 14, 2005, 04:12:02 AM »

Maybe you could start another thread about book covers? I think we've already given the joke mod multiple pages too much exposure.
Posted by: jester
« on: October 14, 2005, 02:31:12 AM »

Exactly! ;) You know that you are in for a treat with a carefully neglected, random cover.