Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:

Verification:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What color is grass?:
What is the seventh word in this sentence?:
What is five minus two (use the full word)?:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: mukut
« on: February 04, 2009, 01:43:43 PM »

OHHH... this one.
Yup, prefer the other one I think... so that's a skipper in the installation...

Thank you, though. :) Wow, second time already today that I say that to you.
Posted by: Andyr
« on: January 11, 2005, 04:24:46 PM »

Added.
Posted by: Andyr
« on: January 10, 2005, 07:10:12 PM »

No harm in doing it here too, I guess.
Posted by: seanas
« on: January 10, 2005, 05:16:06 PM »

both the Imoen Romance and Chloe fix this already - admittedly, maybe not as widespread as UB, but still...
Posted by: MoonElf
« on: January 10, 2005, 04:40:21 PM »

Perhaps you could include a fix for the fact that Imoen2.bcs is not assigned to Imoen213.cre meaning that when rescued at high levels Imoen doesn't initiate conversation with you in the maze under asylum nor when she gets her soul back. Seems like a good fit under minor dialog restorations, its easy enough to do(everythings there it just needs to be assigned) and I don't know of anywhere else this is fixed.
Posted by: Mongoose87
« on: December 07, 2004, 09:47:08 PM »

IIRC someoen back whe nthis was part of Forogttenwars suggested the idea.
Posted by: O
« on: December 07, 2004, 06:23:54 PM »

I concur wholeheartedly with jester. I'd absolutely love a way to kill the sanctimonius prick without breaking the plot. With a fork! :D
Posted by: jester
« on: December 07, 2004, 06:21:59 PM »

Well, as long as it is not in the game, he is 'officially' not. The musings of a developer are irrelevant. If there is something implemented in the files, then go for it. Otherwise it would be a mod like any other that adds new content.

If somebody takes this up, please let me kill him. :D
Posted by: Murdane
« on: December 07, 2004, 05:58:25 PM »

Someone reported that Dave Gaider said that Elhan was originally supposed to be a Bhaalspawn, betray the PC and come back in TOB.

...but it's still not in the game.  Even if Dave Gaider *did* say that, if it didn't show up in the game, then there is no need to consider Elhan a child of Bhaal by default.

Posted by: Barren
« on: December 07, 2004, 05:34:16 PM »

Someone reported that Dave Gaider said that Elhan was originally supposed to be a Bhaalspawn, betray the PC and come back in TOB.
Posted by: Murdane
« on: December 07, 2004, 05:31:20 PM »


Don't forget that Elhan's a child of Bhaal as well, by the way...  ;)

I don't recall such a thing ever being mentioned in the game, by Elhan or anyone else.

I can't stand Elhan, myself, but I won't rant about him right now.
Posted by: jester
« on: December 07, 2004, 05:26:24 PM »

Ah, then he should show up in ToB. Saradush perhaps or anything of that kind. Does he mention his heritage? I cannot remember.
Posted by: Barren
« on: December 07, 2004, 05:24:18 PM »

No, he Dimension Doors away.

Don't forget that Elhan's a child of Bhaal as well, by the way...  ;)
Posted by: MERLANCE
« on: December 07, 2004, 05:21:29 AM »

I wonder, if that would actually change anything for the player? I mean : does it matter at all? I never fight him anyway.

Indeed. You try, you die. Darn pansy elves attacking you... It should be completely possible for a child o Bhaal to slaughter an elf army. OF course, that breaks the plot.

What happens if you attack him in the elven city? Do elves still pop in and insta-death you?
Posted by: jester
« on: December 07, 2004, 02:42:56 AM »

I wonder, if that would actually change anything for the player? I mean : does it matter at all? I never fight him anyway.