Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:

Verification:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What color is grass?:
What is the seventh word in this sentence?:
What is five minus two (use the full word)?:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: Rayne
« on: January 27, 2006, 09:17:21 PM »

Well then scratch that idea.
Posted by: Ghreyfain
« on: January 27, 2006, 08:46:05 PM »

It would be, but it can't be done in the IE.  Crashes the game to make a spear 1-handed, and there aren't any animations for 1-handed spears to begin with.
Posted by: Rayne
« on: January 27, 2006, 06:55:51 PM »

While we're talking about suggestions here, I got one:
Remember the hoplites from ancient Greece? Wouldn't it be great if you could use a shield with your spear?
Posted by: fallen demon
« on: February 28, 2005, 04:13:04 PM »

The spell works differently then just setting the group infravision or selecting an elf!?
Posted by: jester
« on: February 28, 2005, 06:42:56 AM »

Yes, you are right. Freedom of choice is what matters. I for one found out after much experimenting that infravision seems nearly useless, but it can also see through armour and clothing (little known fact!) to look for ..erm... hidden weapons and stuff.
Posted by: Ghreyfain
« on: February 28, 2005, 06:33:49 AM »

Just because it's a bad decision, doesn't mean it should be restricted.  The game doesn't restrict you from selecting Infravision as one of your spells, now does it?  If a mage wants to spend his first proficiency on flail and his second (6th level!) in dual wield, then more power to him.  Or rather, significantly less power.  But whatever.
Posted by: jester
« on: February 28, 2005, 04:23:38 AM »

Any mage wielding a weapon beyond his hands is a joke really. I would not want to part an old man from his walking stick, but if you want to double wield morning stars, get yourself a fighter/ mage.
Posted by: Eral
« on: February 27, 2005, 11:31:23 PM »

Aww, we were serious last week. :( 
Posted by: Ghreyfain
« on: February 26, 2005, 03:16:31 PM »

Sim's right.  Everyone be serious.  BG2 isn't supposed to be about fun.
Posted by: SimDing0™
« on: February 26, 2005, 05:53:06 AM »

We are not playing games here.
Posted by: Eral
« on: February 26, 2005, 05:51:12 AM »

They would be crossing guards.
Posted by: Ghreyfain
« on: February 25, 2005, 08:27:14 PM »

What about mages with... yield signs?
Posted by: CORVIS TERRIBLE MOUNTAIN GOD
« on: February 25, 2005, 07:41:09 PM »

Mages with swords are inferior to mages with crossbows.
Posted by: SimDing0™
« on: February 24, 2005, 09:37:26 AM »

With Universal Weapons installed, it'd be quite cool to see enemies taking advantage of their newfound abilities too. Some enemy mages could use swords, for example. I don't think this would be an obscene amount of work with ADD_CRE_ITEM, and it wouldn't be necessary to go through every CRE in the game, but rather just select a few specific cases. Just a thought.