Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:

Verification:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What color is grass?:
What is the seventh word in this sentence?:
What is five minus two (use the full word)?:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: L_Jonté
« on: March 15, 2003, 05:59:04 PM »

Quote
On second thought, it would be more fun to be an old-fogey judge than an airhead actress one. The old guys always manage to turn their critiques of the meal into social commentary.
                   BWAHAHA!!!  Don't forget to use the word "luxurious" a lot in your assessments.

For my own part, I offer up some sort of prize for the winner.  A Sequential Tart t-shirt perhaps?  Originial Artwork?  A stylish Arcana Jayne lunchbox?  Let me know if you're interested Chairman Jason.                    
Posted by: Seifer
« on: March 15, 2003, 05:45:38 PM »

That stands to reason, I'll take a look!                    
Posted by: weimer
« on: March 15, 2003, 04:15:53 PM »

I'd have to agree with Jason here. With the exception of Valen, none of my mods were "quick" in any real sense. I seem to prefer long-term incremental development.                    
Posted by: jcompton
« on: March 15, 2003, 03:40:12 PM »

As the blurb says, judging is likely to be arbitrary, but maybe we'll score on categories such as "creativity" and "technical accomplishment."

Besides, the accomplishments of someone likely to enter like, say, Wes cannot be ignored, but that doesn't necessarily mean someone else won't come up with a better mod in that 3 hour span. To a large extent, it's an equalizer.

                   
Posted by: Seifer
« on: March 15, 2003, 02:25:59 PM »

Is there going to be sub categories in the assessment, many people might feel that there is no chance of them getting anywhere if guys to the calibre of Weimer et al are entering?                    
Posted by: Kiki
« on: March 15, 2003, 01:19:13 PM »

I can do some very basic things. I think it would be more fun to judge than to beat my head against the wall of my own ignorance.

On second thought, it would be more fun to be an old-fogey judge than an airhead actress one. The old guys always manage to turn their critiques of the meal into social commentary.                    
Posted by: jcompton
« on: March 15, 2003, 12:48:46 PM »

You should enter, aren't you developing m@d skillz?
                   
Posted by: Kiki
« on: March 15, 2003, 11:55:28 AM »

I wanna be a judge! I'll follow the skinny Asian actress judging model: "I don't really like this one. The kobold is sort of mean and he has no fashion sense."                      
Posted by: L_Jonté
« on: March 15, 2003, 11:12:59 AM »

HA!  I'll be in the cheap seats hooting and cheering!                      
Posted by: jcompton
« on: March 15, 2003, 01:43:55 AM »

Click here for details on my latest mad scheme:

http://forums.pocketplane.net/index.php?topic=321.0

(Wes, you ARE still in, right?)