Posted by: jcompton
« on: August 13, 2002, 03:01:03 PM »See e-mail for bug report. (item descriptions are not being pulled in, and some redundant references are being made.)
Oh, right, in order. That would probably make it easier for your translators. Next version will put 'em in order of appearance.But my curiosity still lingers...how was WeiDU picking the order before?
--traify works crazy fast, and appears to work correctly.Oh, right, in order. That would probably make it easier for your translators. Next version will put 'em in order of appearance.
Question: There's no obvious rhyme or reason to the order in which .tra refs appear, compared to the original order in the .d. Is it easily explained, just to satisfy my curiosity?
Potential future feature request from somebody or other: I could see someone, for whatever reason, wanting to specify the starting .tra value, or wanting to be able to finish TRAifying a file they'd already been TRAing by hand. A quick experiment shows that --traify won't look in the old .tra for any references that might already exist (so it's "only" good for 100% hard-coded .d's).
So if you want to say "I call all-time tough titty" on that, this is a good opportunity to do so. At the very least, a little explanation will help me write the docs.
What is this Jason. I must've missed that conversation. Your new hard-coded .d to .d/.tra converter technology frightens me. I'm just a caveman!As I recall, it was a serendipitous offer from Wes, something that I'd secretly hoped we could have someday but never thought to ask about...